BEFORE: Evotec, Milton Park
AFTER: Evotec, Milton Park
BEFORE: Amgen, Milton Park
AFTER: Amgen, Milton Park
BEFORE: Immunotec, Milton Park
AFTER: Immunotec, Milton Park
BEFORE: Green Biologics, Milton Park
AFTER: Green Biologics, Milton Park
BEFORE: Vertex, Milton Park
AFTER: Vertex, Milton Park,
BEFORE: Oxitec, Milton Park
AFTER: Oxitec, Milton Park
BEFORE: ResMed, Milton Park
AFTER: ResMed, Milton Park
These photos from a recent job for OBN (Oxford Bioscience Network) contrast the pre shoot iPhone reference photos with the final dusk photos produced with a full frame camera, tilt shift lens, careful composition and cropping.
Geometry & Silence 
Amazing and inspiring!
Brilliant example of what some thought + timing can create,
Hi Richard, most of these were shot with 17mm TS
Great – thanks, that’s useful to know. This is great idea for you to point clients to prior to carrying out work I suppose. I might make one of these!
I use the 17-40mm L for most of mine, but does the TS make your workflow easier? For me, I’m happy to correct verticals etc. but I worry about the quality loss this creates when I often crop too.
My perception is the the TS is easy to use once you know how, the quality is unparalleled (sharpness + depth of field) and that it helps you out of many tight spots when photographing buildings on a parallel… how annoying it is when you can’t back up/don’t want to any further and the building still isn’t in the frame!
Hi Richard your assessment of the advantages of the 17 TS are correct width the important additional benefit that it helps artistically as one can control the composition by moving the horizon up and down in the frame. I started with a fixed 20mm then used the 16-35 for a few years before I could afford the 17TS